Should wealthy nations, like the US, work to reduce poverty everywhere? NO. That's a myth we should help everybody or everywhere. Who should we help? We should be devoting our effort to the last billion poor.
Fortunately, we mostly agree to the bottom billion or last billion poor are those people who make less than a dollar per day adjusted. The United Nations does an annual study called the Human Development Index. The index measures not only income but other quality of life factors in the areas of health and education. The tables of 177 indexed countries are divided into high, medium, and low human development. Graphically, high human development countries are shown in blue, medium in yellow, and low in red. In general, I think these countries, low human development in red, should our target for help, aid and assistance.
I totally agree that we (the wealthy nations) are allowing millions of children to die each year in the countries where the poor of the poor live. But the questions become who are the poor of the poor, or in Biblical terms, the least of these (Matthew 28:31-46).
This post is a personal exposition of the article, A first step for the global poor – shatter six myths | csmonitor.com. The article was written by journalist and former presidential speech writer Mark Lange about lessons from China on ending poverty. Part One of a five-part series story, An End to Poverty -- New hope for the last billion poor, published by the Christian Science Monitor.
Could it be possible to eradicate abject poverty in one lifetime? Ever since it was first asked, the question has seemed an improbable wish – a salve for the heart, untenable to the mind. But today, the answer is as clear as it is imperative: Yes.
The idea that every living person can have the basics essential to human survival – and from there, begin to climb the ladder of economic development – is a prospect within reach. It does not require a master plan that solves all the world's problems. It does demand that wealthy nations change their approach in ways both subtle and significant.
It also means that the world's poorest – the last billion people who barely survive on the equivalent of less than $1 a day – must turn from lifetimes of bleak experience and look with higher expectations toward what is possible.
Today, the "average" person on the edge of survival is a child. Within the next hour, 1,200 more of them will perish. There are no easy solutions. But there is a clear path toward progress.